Showing posts with label new york times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label new york times. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 15, 2020

No Holds Bari


I don't know very much about the erstwhile New York Times opinion writer Bari Weiss, who sent an over-the-top letter of resignation to the publisher yesterday that I predicted would be misinterpreted as talking about the newsroom rather than the very separate opinion department for which she worked. (I knew I could count on you, New York Post. The Washington Post's longtime "center-right" columnist also took the bait, as did a rogues' gallery of the usual rightwing suspects.)

She writes:
They have called me a Nazi and a racist; I have learned to brush off comments about how I’m “writing about the Jews again.” Several colleagues perceived to be friendly with me were badgered by coworkers. My work and my character are openly demeaned on company-wide Slack channels where masthead editors regularly weigh in. There, some coworkers insist I need to be rooted out if this company is to be a truly “inclusive” one, while others post ax emojis next to my name. Still other New York Times employees publicly smear me as a liar and a bigot on Twitter with no fear that harassing me will be met with appropriate action.
Weiss, whose less-than-twice-monthly columns apparently often incited controversy, claims the paper failed after the 2016 election to learn “lessons about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a democratic society.” She says she was the subject of "constant bullying by colleagues who disagree with my views" and that Twitter has become the paper's "ultimate editor.”

I can't speak to her experience at the Times. But if not wanting to "understand" racist voters is the principal charge being leveled here, then pardon me for not jumping to prosecute. And as for the "bullying” allegation, my first instinct whenever an adult uses the term is that he or she simply can't handle any type of pushback. Weiss famously questioned whether sexual assault should disqualify Brett Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court and people slammed her for it. Sorry, but not all criticism is illegitimate, despite what the Reality TV generation may have told you about ignoring "the haters."


And sure enough, Weiss is a millennial. And those who do know her claim she's much better at dishing it out than taking it. For example: She's said to have accused multiple Arab professors critical of Israel of being racists (sound familiar?) and has been accused of trying to get a Times contributor fired for using profanity on Twitter (is that "bullying"?). But even so, I wanted to learn more.


I still have contacts at the Gray Lady, some of whom tell me that a conference call to talk about the James Bennet situation was quickly commandeered by some of the younger staffers who were not willing to discuss the matter other than to say he had to be let go, immediately. (His deputy, James Dao, was removed from the paper's masthead and reassigned to the newsroom.) For the uninitiated, Bennet -- who was poached from The Atlantic as the possible next executive editor of the Gray Lady -- was fired for running a piece by Republican Sen. Tom Cotton that called for the U.S. government to deploy military troops to deter looting amid protests sparked by the police killing of George Floyd. The column drew immediately backlash, with hundreds of Times journalists voicing their opposition, tweeting the headline, writing “Running this put Black @NYTimes staff in danger.” 

Twenty-year NYT veteran Jodi Rudoren wrote that when Bennet was forced to resign as Opinion editor, she was worried

"I found the argument that publishing the OpEd endangered anyone’s life to be specious, though it was repeated by many of my former colleagues on Twitter; I thought that organized, open revolt violated every code of collegiality; and I worried that the paper was cowering from its historic role as the host of raucous but respectful debate."

At the time, his dismissal was attributed to the publisher’s disgust that Bennet argued that he hadn’t even read the piece before publication. But I've since been told that the "Bennet didn't even read it" smoking gun for his removal was absurd because deputies are frequently in charge of articles, including guest columns, and that he couldn't possibly read everything. And that several staffers on the call did want to speak up in his defense, but felt like they could not. Hmm. 

I generally don't feel much sympathy for people who willfully choose not to get with the program. Evolve or get out of the way is almost always the correct approach. But that being said, I have seen enough examples in the LGBTQ world of late to know things aren't always exactly as the kids say they are.

In recent years I've been told that because David France is white and csigender he's not "allowed" to make a film about Marsha P. Johnson -- even one starring a trans woman of color. And since he did, he must have stolen the work of a black transgender filmmaker. Queer black icon and drag pioneer RuPaul has been repeatedly labeled racist and transphobic. LGBTQ Nation shouted that Dolly Parton "just slammed nonbinary and pansexual people" ... because she takes what her capricious goddaughter Miley Cyrus says with a grain of salt. And in December I was informed that J.K. Rowling, about whom I know nothing other than being repeatedly told for 20 years that she was an "LGBTQ icon" -- read about 20 times she was one HERE! -- is transphobic because she offered her support for a female researcher who'd lost her livelihood for saying she believed there are two biological sexes. (I am talking about the wrath Rowling received the first time she had the temerity to speak about the subject; I have already addressed her subsequent comments.)


Meanwhile, "Harry Potter" star Miriam Margolyes is being lauded a "trans hero" for calling Rowling a "gender fascist" -- only when you click through you see that what Margolyes said -- "If you seriously want to become a woman, you should be allowed to" -- it sounds awfully similar to Rowling's "gender fascist" view. Isn't Margolyes implying there are TWO SEXES -- gasp! -- and one would be transitioning from one to become the other? How binary is that?!!!!

To be clear, I'm happy to see people get what they have coming to them when they deserve it. But each situation needs to be judged fairly on its own merits. And lately I find myself shaking my head more often than I used to -- and than I'd like to.

Monday, November 09, 2015

L.O.L.


With thanks to my brother Bill.

Thursday, September 24, 2015

The Grey Lady Gives Good Hed


No boo-boo here!

Friday, September 05, 2014

Can We Talk ... About NYT Corrections?


The Grey Lady's copy desk hasn't been the same since you-know-when ...


Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Jill Abramson Out as New York Times Executive Editor


The Grey Lady's first female editor will be replaced by Dean Baquet, the paper's first black executive editor. They're sort of like Hillary and Barack in reverse, give or take a shove. (Has there ever been a top editor who served a shorter time?)

UPDATE: Pretty gross if this is true:, although the paper's editorial pages don't always see eye-to-eye with its business practices.

From The New York's article Why Jill Abramson was fired:

“Several weeks ago,” writes Ken Auletta, “Abramson discovered that her pay and her pension benefits as both executive editor and, before that, as managing editor were considerably less than the pay and pension benefits of Bill Keller, the male editor whom she replaced in both jobs. ‘She confronted the top brass,’ one close associate said, and this may have fed into the management’s narrative that she was ‘pushy,’ a characterization that, for many, has an inescapably gendered aspect…..”

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Troublesome


Wow. Such a rookie mistake by the Grey Lady.

Monday, January 06, 2014

The Evolution of the N.Y. Times' Home Page in One Gif


   Seen HERE. Can we talk about the hideous new iPad edition that no longer allows you to read the entire paper in one fell swoop????

Friday, November 01, 2013

Spooky Correction


 She jokingly changed her Twitter name for Halloween and the New York Times ended up quoteng her using that name! 

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

No Gray Area



I think it's safe to say Michael and I will never be profiled in the New York Times. Because if the Gray Lady's didn't come calling for recent stories about longtime partners who choose to keep separate apartments or gay couples who don't want to get married, she's clearly not into us! 



Friday, April 18, 2008

The Morning After

(EDITOR'S NOTE: This post was written by guest blogger Frank Anthony Polito.)

Part of the fun of this whole blogging-thing is coming up with what clever item I'm going to post next...


So last night I went to bed around 4:00 AM. I set the alarm for 10:00, thinking I'd wake up early, do a little blogging, check my emails, then head to Starbucks (for those of you who don't know me, I'm a huge Starbucks fan! I even wrote about it in my play, Another Day on Willow St)

What I forgot was... After a night of drunken debauchery, I don't sleep well. So at 8:45 AM, there I was, wide awake... Now here I am!

Speaking of The Poseiden Adventure...

I must take a moment to brag about something related to my day job (I'm a freelance Publicist). When I logged onto Yahoo! this morning, what did I see?

What Really Sank the Titanic?
A new book blames low-grade rivets for the sinking of the Titanic.

This is a fascinating new book I've been working on for the past few months... The authors, Jennifer Hooper McCarty and Tim Foecke (pronounced "Fakey") have come up with a new theory on how/why the HMS Titanic sunk like a rock 96 years ago. They were written up in The New York Times last week and now everyone wants to talk to them! (Now if only I could get them to take a look at BAND FAGS!)