There was no tasteful way to cover such a tasteless -- and vile -- act. But the Los Angeles Times seems the most egregious to me. Thoughts?
1 comment:
Damian
said...
Their TV CRITIC covered it?! Even if you could kind of grasp the angle they are taking with the piece, the "Did You Watch?" hed -- as though it were the M*A*S*H finale -- is incredibly tone-deaf from journalists covering a barbarity against one of their own. Wow.
1 comment:
Their TV CRITIC covered it?! Even if you could kind of grasp the angle they are taking with the piece, the "Did You Watch?" hed -- as though it were the M*A*S*H finale -- is incredibly tone-deaf from journalists covering a barbarity against one of their own. Wow.
Post a Comment