I just don't understand how someone who is *that* attractive can deface their body to that extent. The leg tattoo is beyond hideous. It's like spraying graffiti on a Greek statue. So very sad.
He's unquestionably attractive but those ridiculous tattoos ruin his looks overall. The one on his arm looks like the filigree on an old book, the one on his leg is just hideous.
My finely honed sense* of tattoo-ability says the arm art is fine, the leg work... well, not so much. But like the above commentor, why is it that these ridiculously hot guys feel the need to mutilate their bodies?
* which tells me that on other guys, hot; on me, not.
I've always wondered about people who do full arm and leg tatts on one side of the body and not the other. Is that supposed to signigy something, like way back when with pierced ears? If they're really into bodymod, it would be fun to see tatts on one side and piercings on the other. This guy's T-shirt kind of indicates no nipp piercings, tho.
Tatts look hot on lean or muscle bodies, but I shudder to think about the poor nursing home staff that is going to have to deal with this in their future. I personally have some tatts on my decently in-shape body, and they "mean" something to me but are also on areas that shouldn't really sag or stretch much as I get older.
As for "defacing" a person, different strokes for different folks, etc. Main thing for me is that it might look hot now but how about later? At least piercings can be removed easily.
11 comments:
too hot!!
Did I say HOT!! SMOKING HOT.
GREAT TATOOS
Steve
Tattos are hot. I'm totally into them :)
I just don't understand how someone who is *that* attractive can deface their body to that extent. The leg tattoo is beyond hideous. It's like spraying graffiti on a Greek statue. So very sad.
He's unquestionably attractive but those ridiculous tattoos ruin his looks overall. The one on his arm looks like the filigree on an old book, the one on his leg is just hideous.
One day, someone is going to wake up and look in the mirror, sob lightly, and then break out in a cold sweat.
When will this self-mutilation fad end?
Can someone explain why he has tats on his right arm and *shudder* leg but not on his left?
Because he's not finished yet, Henry Holland.
WOOF!
My finely honed sense* of tattoo-ability says the arm art is fine, the leg work... well, not so much. But like the above commentor, why is it that these ridiculously hot guys feel the need to mutilate their bodies?
* which tells me that on other guys, hot; on me, not.
I've always wondered about people who do full arm and leg tatts on one side of the body and not the other. Is that supposed to signigy something, like way back when with pierced ears? If they're really into bodymod, it would be fun to see tatts on one side and piercings on the other. This guy's T-shirt kind of indicates no nipp piercings, tho.
Tatts look hot on lean or muscle bodies, but I shudder to think about the poor nursing home staff that is going to have to deal with this in their future. I personally have some tatts on my decently in-shape body, and they "mean" something to me but are also on areas that shouldn't really sag or stretch much as I get older.
As for "defacing" a person, different strokes for different folks, etc. Main thing for me is that it might look hot now but how about later? At least piercings can be removed easily.
Post a Comment