![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPVCvBw6TeIygkY3HXXzFX6P-ohMkapi9MX2eW7_B9OA2IlvlhOxC2Cpwu2MZB7hGpGT45g69xYyPWhJ7qZay4GaNlBq5nRSuY6v89aHJxIn7xqcj0L2wkFYZ0d867LI6fOXSZ/s400/fusion.jpg)
Three firms in Ohio refused to print Kent State's gay student publication, but getting a straight answer as to why hasn't been easy. The spring 2010 issue of Fusion, published a year ago, depicted partial male nudity on its back cover and in a six-page spread inside, yet this time a photo of bulge in a leotard was deemed too "graphic." (A fourth printer ended up printing the magazine, but charged $2,200 to rush it through.) Read about the controversy
HERE.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgVKLbIa6FVreXCQ7I4Bp0v2e-J-ITdsxjVyA2A25GJsr7GiyYYBVGUQHELVKBC8L1o1E7U5XaXEqKAW737r0dMjstE1DLRSt1vjxDwO1tpnYAvMgA0wm4ZwAoLbpKFQq0vo-y5/s400/fusion2.jpg)
A six-page spread in last year's spring issue of Fusion featured "Boys in Bottoms." The issue's publisher, Freeport Press Inc., said it published the images in error.
No comments:
Post a Comment