Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Page 1 Consider (10/25)


  • Rumor Mill: Whispers about the precarious state of Chris Evert's marriage to former Olympic skier Andy Mill have swirled around tennis circles for years, but I guess this time they're real. She and Husband No. 2 issued a joint statement confirming that they will divorce after 18 years of marriage and three sons. Oh, Chris. (People)

  • NJ Is For [Blank]: Today's the day Jim McGreevey has been waiting a lifetime 10 months for: he and the rest of the gays will find out whether we'll be able to marry in New Jersey or not. A ruling is expected this afternoon. (Advocate)

  • All the Wrong Moves: First a Scientologist, now Tom Cruise is a lesbian. (OMG)

  • Babewatch: If David Charvet gets any hotter with age I may have to hurt someone. (Egotastic!)

  • The Amazing Meow: Reichen Lehmkuhl, the boyfriend of Lance Bass, revealed he was sexually assaulted while a cadet in the Air Force Academy and contemplated suicide after the incident. "I think that's the first time that I've said that that happened," he told ABC News. "I've been ashamed of it." Just Jared reader Leland writes in: "Countless people understandably jumped to the conclusion from his general description on ABC's "Good Morning America" that he was forcibly sodomized or forced to perform oral sex on others, when his book clearly states that what he was forced to do, after being taken from his room, stripped, and his eyes covered, was push-ups into another man's mouth. There may be a term for that, but I sincerely doubt "sexual assault" is it. Unfortunately, those interpretations led many to become uncompensated cogs in the Reichen PR machine." (OUCH!) (JJ)

  • Smells Like Royalties: Wow, that Courtney Love is one lucky woman. Kurt Cobain now outranks Elvis as the top-earning dead celebrity. His estate brought in $50 million last year, followed by Elvis' $42 million and "Peanuts" cartoon strip creator Charles Schulz at No. 3 with $35 million. (Reuters)

  • Like a Prayer: I was flying off the handle to my family about the rampant (and increased) violence going on in Iraq during the so-called "Muslim holy month" of Ramada: "Attacks have spiked in Baghdad since the beginning of Ramadan, the Muslim period of fasting and repentance that will come to an end this week with the three-day holiday of Id al-Fitr, when Muslims traditionally gather with their families to celebrate the end of the fasting period." Brother Terence joined in with this poignant observation: "U.S. soldiers [are told] to cool it during Ramadan, especially near holy sites, because Americans don't want to look as though they don't respect the religion that these particular Muslims don't even respect. Irreverent cartoons are way over the line, but they can blow up stores and bakeries where women are buying food for the end-of-Ramadan feast." (Beautifully put.) People keep trying to convince me that this type of behavior is that of extremists, not decent everyday Muslims. But wouldn't it be more accurate to say that this is the behavior of actual Muslims rather than nonthreatening (read: nonpracticing) Muslims? If you want to jump on the religion bandwagon (any of them), then why not respect the ones who go "all out" in observing the often ridiculous and inhumane practices that accompany such practices. If you really want to go down that road then you should be outraged that the Palestinian people have had their land "occupied" and "stolen." Kill everyone who is oppressing you from being on your "holy land," damn it! I don't want anything to do with any of that crap -- just as I don't want anything to do with any true Christians -- you know, the ones who "follow the Bible" and think all gays are going to hell and that women don't have the right to choose what to do with their bodies, and so on. (Kill the abortion doctors too, bunch of evil sinners.) Are you following my logic here? (NYT)
  • 8 comments:

    Anonymous said...

    David Charvet looks great, as does Brooke.
    As for Reichen, I am so sick and tired of people (I won't call him a celebrity) using these confessions to feed their own PR machines.
    Disagree with you on the Muslim comments, I believe they are the extremists and uneducated.

    So, I know you are big fan of Debbie Harry. What do you think of Kirsten Dunst possibly playing her?

    Steve Reed said...

    You're confusing having religious beliefs with being an extremist. You can be Muslim without wanting to wage jihad against non-believers. You can be Christian without wanting all the gays to burn in hell. In fact, what you're doing is perpetuating stereotypes about both religions based on the conduct of their most conservative, fundamentalist elements.

    Anonymous said...

    I said EIGHTEEN YEARS AGO that the Everet-Mill marriage was all wrong and would never last. I was right. HA! Mill was handsome, but his talent and celebrity paled in comparison to hers. She could have done better. GO CHRIS, GO!

    STEVE - BRAVO and well said. You cannot indict an entire religion based on the actions of a few. That would be like thinking that all gays were like the Robin Williams and Nathan Lane characters in "The Birdcage" - at the extremes (not that there is anything wrong with that, mind you). Kenneth - I am surprised to her you implicate like this!

    As for Reichen Leimchul (spelling?), his 15 minutes of fame were up hours ago - he is a conceited asshole dazed by celebrity and his own ego.

    Anonymous said...

    I don't know about that, Steve. Have you read THE BIBLE?

    Anonymous said...

    i think you're all missing the point on religion. it's a deliberate exaggeration but a valid point. why not say these extremists are trying harder to follow the religion that those of us who chose A LA CARTE religion.

    don't forget:

    "If a man lies with a woman during her sickness and uncovers her nakedness, he has discovered her flow, and she has uncovered the flow of her blood. Both of them shall be cut off from her people." (Leviticus 20:18)

    "For everyone who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death. He has cursed his father or his mother. His blood shall be upon him." (Leviticus 20:9)

    "Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property." (Leviticus 25:44-45)

    "Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard." (Leviticus 19:27) (KEN WILL LIKE THIS ONE)

    "...and the swine, though it divides the hoof, having cloven hooves, yet does not chew the cud, is unclean to you." (Leviticus 11:7)

    "...do not plant your field with two kinds of seed. Do not wear material woven of two kinds of material." (Leviticus 19:19)

    "But all in the seas or in the rivers that do not have fins and scales, all that move in the water or any living thing which is in the water, they are an abomination to you." (Leviticus 11:10)

    Steve Reed said...

    Among the adherents to any belief system there are going to be varying degrees of belief. Some people read the Bible literally, some people interpret it more symbolically. Same is true of the Koran or virtually any religious text. The literalists, the fundamentalists, are no more correct or religious than the others -- they just tend to be more certain, and perhaps less tempered by reason.

    Anonymous said...

    exactly! so what makes someone on one end of the spectrum right and the other wrong?

    the 9/11 hijackers did what they did based on their belief system. (now you are going to judge someone else's faith?)

    therein lies the problem.

    Steve Reed said...

    Not sure what that means, Jesus. I never said fundamentalists aren't dangerous. I mean only that it's wrong to construe them as "more religous," or more representative of their religion, than moderates.

    (And at the risk of taking over Kenneth's blog, I'm going to be quiet now!)