Showing posts with label sexual harassment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sexual harassment. Show all posts

Monday, August 19, 2019

#MeToo's Unintended Consquence


Another day, another batch of new sexual-harassment allegations I'm wondering: Am alone here?

I say this with some hesitation -- but since I control no levers of power my opinion doesn't matter much, so here goes: As long as I can remember my stance has been to BELIEVE people who say they were victims. It never meant believe blindly. It just seemed logical and right to err on the side of believing unless something compelling indicated otherwise.

But lately I have found myself shifting ... ironically as awareness has reached a new high. What started as a worthwhile and overdue movement that strove to shift societal norms moving forward feels like it has devolved into a score-settling grudgefest. And for every Harvey Weinstein and Les Moonves exposed, there seem to be increasingly more instances like Aziz Ansari, James Franco, Carter Oosterhouse, (Daniel Franzese?!), George Takei and don't forget Cade Hudson.

The list is long, and none of them is helping more vulnerable and overlooked abuse victims (women and children first). Obviously #MeToo is still a vital movement. But it's been hijacked in such a way that I'm growing more skeptical than ever -- and I would imagine others in actual positions of power are too, which hardly seems like the goal.

Thursday, September 13, 2018

Which Famous Actress Did Les Moonves Slip the Tongue in the CBS Dining Room?


The million-dollar question from Linda Bloodworth Thomason's scathing piece yesterday on disgraced CBS president Les Moonves:
"Soon, I would hear how he had invited a famous actress to lunch in the CBS dining room. Coming off the cancellation of her iconic detective show, the star began pitching a new one. He informed her that she was too old to be on his network. She began to cry and stood up to go. He stood up too, taking her by the shoulders and telling her, “I can’t let you leave like this.” She reacted, suddenly touched. Then he shoved his tongue down her throat. I know this happened because the star is the person who told me." 
Who was the female star?

My friend's first guess was Angela Lansbury -- which the internet seems to agree with -- but it seemed off to me given Moonves's penchant for young flesh. My first guess was Cybill Shepherd, whose "Moonlighting" had been off the air for a few years and she would have been about 45 when Moonves took over in 1995. But her show "Cybill" did end up on CBS, although it's possible the story is somewhat intentionally disguised ("Cybill" did get abruptly canceled during his tenure). Also, I can only seeing her punching rather than crying -- if someone said that to her!

UPDATE: Your guesses are very much appreciated. A friend has pointed me to what appears to be the correct "answer" HERE.

Friday, March 02, 2018

Remains of the Day (03/02)


Life After Dawn: Transgender journalist reveals her #MeToo experiences (plural) with Jeffrey Tambor, who was fired from "Transparent" for similar behavior

The New Yorker: Russia and Iran deepen ties to challenge Crazy Donald and the U.S.

Boy Culture: Armie Hammer's furry chest preps for Oscars

Baseline: Andy Murray built a tennis-playing snowman, while Novak Djokovic made a spectacle of himself on mass transit

The New York Times: Seeking asylum, an escort has a tale of Trump and Russia to offer

Curbed: New York City's 25 most-expensive homes for sale

Dlisted: How the hell did Gwyneth Paltrow land this hot piece of ass?


Towleroad: Tiffany & Co. swarmed by homophobic trolls for celebrating Max Emerson and his boyfriend

The Randy Report: Pulse club shooting survivors meet Parkland school shooting survivors

BosGuy: This isn't so much a treasure trail as a treasure island

Kurt Eichenwald: Trump says trade wars "are easy to win" ... same guy who said his casinos, airline, mortgage company, steak line, clothing company, housewares company etc. would be "great successes"

IntlGymnast: First male victim files suit in Larry Nassar case

Savage Love: Woman's biggest issue with bisexual lover is that he laps up his own jizz 


The WoW Report: "Then I just hate you and I hate your ass face." -- Corky St. Clair in "Waiting for Guffman"

Matthew's Island of Misfit Toys: Who could resist a booty call with these boys?

People: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle invite public to wedding day

CBS Sports: Baseball coach fired for refusing to recruit Colorado player over weed laws

The Guardian: Tracey Thorn's new album filled with funny, graceful songs of female power

The Washington Post: "Jared has faded": Inside the 28 days of tumult that left Kushner badly diminished


Hot Cat of the Day: Reminds me of my sweet Larry, who had his own toothbrush that he used -- by himself -- daily!

Friday, December 29, 2017

Mary Ann Georgantopoulos of BuzzFeed Conspires With Jonathan Well to Produce #RevengePorn Against Jann Wenner


Hmm, has anyone else checked out this BuzzFeed piece? (Best to read before hearing me out.) This isn't anything like what BuzzFeed reported another man says happened to him with Jann Wenner. (An alleged quid pro quo.) This is a grievous invasion of Wenner's privacy poorly dressed up as a #MeToo story. Just as this accuser (Jonathan Wells) had a hard time labeling "what happened" to him, so would any reasonable person. It's very possible both men could be telling their version of the "truth." But if Wenner wasn't aware of Wells's take then I don't see how it's at all fair to Wenner to fill him in for the world to hear. (Has everyone forgotten what a phone is?) Someone drunk and on coke putting the moves on someone -- and the object of their desire not saying no or protesting in any way -- and then this person coming back on two separate occasions to have “consensual sex” afterward could very reasonably have allowed Wenner to think it was consensual. (Wouldn't anyone?) And if Wells felt like he couldn’t say no to Wenner — who was NOT HIS BOSS at the time of the alleged assault— simply because he was rich and famous, that says more about Wells and our obsession with celebrity culture than it does about Wenner. (And let’s not even get into Wells’s “daddy issues.”) Wenner eventually realized the guy wasn't into him and dropped it. 



Jonathan Wells's story is suited for a therapist, not a reporter 

The other part isn't as easy to gauge — but that certainly didn’t stop BuzzFeed from using a watonly misleading headline. People who like each other often do nice things for one another. (Every kind act isn't secretly motivated by something nefarious.) And book publishing is an extremely precarious business. But to the more specific charge, I'm not sure threatening "gay" blackmail is any better than threatening legal action to try to stop a book you wish you'd jumped at from getting published by a rival. Bottom line: Shame on Mary Ann Georgantopoulos and BuzzFeed for this sleazy attempt at publicly shaming an openly gay man for what he does in his personal life. Wells has every right to feel any way he wants and to tell whomever he wants. But that doesn't mean media outlets have to breathlessly regurgitate every word every accuser says. Yes we should lean toward believing victims. But each accusation needs to be evaluated on its own merits, and not every incident is worthy of a news story. This article has no business in a supermarket tabloid much less a Pulitzer-nominated news site. What a giant step back for an organization that has worked so hard to be taken seriously and shed its listicle past.

Monday, December 18, 2017

Meryl Streep Responds to Rose McGowan's Criticism: 'I Wasn't Deliberately Silent'


As I wrote over the weekend, I think Rose McGowan is barking up the wrong tree lashing out at other women in Hollywood for their "part" in Harvey Weinstein's crimes. (Apparently she's since deleted her vicious tweet calling out Meryl Streep by name.)

Streep didn't appreciate the attack either, reiterating today that she wasn't deliberately silent -- "I didn't know. I don't tacitly approve of rape. I didn't know."

The statement, first reported by HuffPost, reads:
It hurt to be attacked by Rose McGowan in banner headlines this weekend, but I want to let her know I did not know about Weinstein’s crimes, not in the 90s when he attacked her, or through subsequent decades when he proceeded to attack others. 
I wasn’t deliberately silent. I didn’t know. I don’t tacitly approve of rape. I didn’t know. I don’t like young women being assaulted. I didn’t know this was happening. I don’t know where Harvey lives, nor has he ever been to my home.

I have never in my life been invited to his hotel room.

I have been to his office once, for a meeting with Wes Craven for “Music of the Heart” in 1998.

HW distributed movies I made with other people.

HW was not a filmmaker; he was often a producer, primarily a marketer of films made by other people- some of them great, some not great. But not every actor, actress, and director who made films that HW distributed knew he abused women, or that he raped Rose in the 90s, other women before and others after, until they told us. We did not know that women’s silence was purchased by him and his enablers.

HW needed us not to know this, because our association with him bought him credibility, an ability to lure young, aspiring women into circumstances where they would be hurt.

He needed me much more than I needed him and he made sure I didn’t know. Apparently he hired ex Mossad operators to protect this information from becoming public. Rose and the scores of other victims of these powerful, moneyed, ruthless men face an adversary for whom Winning, at any and all costs, is the only acceptable outcome. That’s why a legal defense fund for victims is currently being assembled to which hundreds of good hearted people in our business will contribute, to bring down the bastards, and help victims fight this scourge within.

Rose assumed and broadcast something untrue about me, and I wanted to let her know the truth. Through friends who know her, I got my home phone number to her the minute I read the headlines. I sat by that phone all day yesterday and this morning, hoping to express both my deep respect for her and others’ bravery in exposing the monsters among us, and my sympathy for the untold, ongoing pain she suffers. No one can bring back what entitled bosses like Bill O’Reilly, Roger Ailes, and HW took from the women who endured attacks on their bodies and their ability to make a living.. And I hoped that she would give me a hearing. She did not, but I hope she reads this.

I am truly sorry she sees me as an adversary, because we are both, together with all the women in our business, standing in defiance of the same implacable foe: a status quo that wants so badly to return to the bad old days, the old ways where women were used, abused and refused entry into the decision-making, top levels of the industry. That’s where the cover-ups convene. Those rooms must be disinfected, and integrated, before anything even begins to change.
Some of my Facebook (and real) friends called Meryl a liar (about not knowing) over the weekend. Curious if they're still prepared to do so now.

Sunday, December 17, 2017

When the Shelley Hack of 'Charmed' Speaks, You Better Listen ...


Here's an idea: Instead of blaming other women for how they did or didn't react, how about men stop sexually abusing them? But if we are foolishly going to go down the “women pointing fingers at women" avenue, could we please put “women who voted for Trump” at the top of the list? 


Join the heated debate on my Facebook page by adding me HERE.

UPDATE: Who is prepared to call Meryl Streep a liar now? Read her response to Rose McGowan HERE.

Thursday, December 14, 2017

Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Trump Sends Sexually Suggestive Tweet About Gillibrand


Donald Trump attacked Kirsten Gillibrand in a sexually suggestive tweet Tuesday morning that implied the New York senator would do anything for money -- a day after his spokeswoman said the matter of Trump's inappropriate behavior toward women was a settled issue.

“The president has addressed these accusations directly and denied all of these allegations,” Sarah Huckabee Sanders said. “And the people of this country, at a decisive election, supported President Trump, and we feel like these allegations have been answered through that process.”

Just like if Hillary Clinton had won Republicans would have never brought up [insert made-up Clinton scandal here] again, right?


To her credit, Gillibrand responded brilliantly, staying out of the mud her colleague Elizabeth Warren found herself in last summer. (Please make this stop.)

Page 1 Roundup (12/12)






Sunday, December 10, 2017

Page 1 Roundup (12/10)










David Ng of the Los Angeles Times conspired with actor Sean Rose to produce #RevengePorn against CAA agent Cade Hudson



From HERE.


I've complained to editor in chief Lewis D'Vorkin and to GLAAD about this article that I believe at its root is homophobic 


Dawn C. Chmielewski and Dominic Patten of Deadline conspired with Bret Tyler Skopek to produce #RevengePorn against Bryan Singer