If you have told me some 30 years ago as I was setting my alarm clock for one of the dozens of Breakfast at Wimbledon telecasts I would savor over the years (I STILL can't believe Chris blew that 4-2 lead in the '78 final!) that a day would come when the women's quarterfinals would be on and I not only didn't care enough to watch them, but barely knew who half the players were, I'd have said you were crazy. But sadly, that's exactly what happened yesterday.
From the summer of '77 till the early '00s, women's tennis was IT for me. From the first time I saw Tracy Austin in her pinafore dress and pigtails to the triumphant resurgence of Jennifer Capriati at the 2001 Australia Open -- and everything in between -- I was obsessed with the ladies of the court.
My brother and I even devised our own competing ranking systems: his involved a Vic Commodore computer that created far more work just entering the data and computer codes than mine, which simply consisted of a spiral notebook and "giving bonus points on top of bonus points." Each week, I'd wait by the mailbox for the latest issue of Inside Women's Tennis to arrive, and then I'd go to work tallying up the results from all the draws that were printed in the back. From there, I would re-arrange the cutout photos of the top 50 players I had on a bulletin board in my bedroom. (I still haven't forgiven my mom for crumbling up my Mima Jausovec photo in a tirade about what a horrible person I was. Granted, the photo didn't really fit in -- it was on a WAY LARGER scale than the others -- but it was the only one I was able to get my hands on, goddammit.)
Back then, I used to worry that the game wouldn't survive the end of Chris and Martina. But then Steffi Graf came along and quickly replaced both of them in my heart, bringing me another decade of women's tennis bliss. (Although cut short, her rivalry with Monica Seles completely consumed me: I still can't watch clips of the 1992 French Open without screaming as each ball is hit; and let's not even talk about the '99 French Open final!) Even when Steffi retired in 1999, Hingis, Capriati, Davenport and Pierce were still keeping things entertaining for awhile. But somewhere in the last few years things really went wrong. First, the Belgians completely sucked the fun out of the game. Then the Williams sisters -- whose idiotic father made it hard for me to warm up to in the first place -- went from dominating to not caring about the game at all. Then, even though they weren't fit and didn't seem to even be trying, the handful of players who had the game to beat them would still roll over and die whenever they played 'em. (Talk about annoying. I completely gave up on Lindsay Davenport because of this; Maria Sharapova was the one exception when she beautifully let Serena have it in the 2004 Wimbledon final.) Oh, and when they weren't handing matches to the Williamses for no reason ALL of the top women took turns becoming complete choke artists: Jankovic, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Myskina, Mauresmo, Clijsters, Zvonareva, Dementieva, Safina and so on. (And they are all REALLY BORING!) A writer friend of mine confided in me after one particuarly embarrassing Grand Slam blowout that he was beginning to disagree with Billie Jean King's equal pay argument.
Don't get me wrong, there were certainly many one-sided matches "back in the day." The dropoff after the top 5 or so players was HUGE, and Chris actually even beat Martina and Tracy 6-0, 6-0 in the early '80s at various points. But I don't EVER recall seeing Chris, Martina, Tracy, Andrea Jaeger, Billie Jean King or Evonne Goolagong become completely unable to play during big points or through ENTIRE Grand Slam finals the way these gals do now. (Even loopy Hana Mandlikova knew how to give the top players a hard time when push came to shove.) I only wish Tracy Austin's matches against Chris and Martina at the 1981 Toyota Series Championships had been filmed so I could relive the power, precision and steely determination of it all.This fortnight looks like it's heading toward another all-Williams final. They both seem to be quite "on" again, so they definitely deserve to be where they are. Unfortunately, history has shown that the awkward situation of playing your sister in a Grand Slam final does not equal entertaining tennis. So even though I'm happy they're back in the game, this scenario -- like it has in years past -- only adds to my increasing lack of interest in a game I once loved. If there's a cure for women's tennis, I sure don't know what it is.






























