Supreme Court Will Hear ACLU Case About Cake Shop Refusing Service to Same-Sex Couple

Normally I would be voicing my outrage that in 2017 we would still be having to go court over what is essentially a "NO COLOREDS ALLOWED" sign being dusted off and hung up again. (And in Colorado, no less, a blue state!) But if this case is properly adjudicated, it could finally shut down once and for all this bullshit "religious freedom" argument bigots have been trying to use. But I said "if." We're lucky Justice Kennedy, who has been the voice of reason on these matters, is still on the court. But should he decide to resign this summer, there's no telling how much damage the "new" Roberts court could inflict before it's over -- potentially setting the civil rights movement back 55 years. Is this really what we get for suggesting people stop calling black people the N-word, gay people the F-word and women "girls"?

The American Civil Liberties Union writes:

The Supreme Court today announced it will review a decision from the Colorado Court of Appeals that found that a cake shop discriminated against a same-sex couple by refusing to sell them a wedding cake.

In 2012, Colorado residents David Mullins and Charlie Craig visited Masterpiece Cakeshop to order a wedding cake. Mullins and Craig planned to marry in Massachusetts and then celebrate with family and friends back home. Masterpiece owner Jack Phillips informed the couple that, because of his religious beliefs, it was his standard business practice to refuse to provide cakes for same-sex weddings. Phillips had turned away several other couples for the same reason.

“This has always been about more than a cake. Businesses should not be allowed to violate the law and discriminate against us because of who we are and who we love,” said Mullins. His husband, Craig, added, “While we’re disappointed that the courts continue debating the simple question of whether LGBT people deserve to be treated like everyone else, we hope that our case helps ensure that no one has to experience being turned away simply because of who they are.”

The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Colorado represent Mullins and Craig in the case. Under Colorado law, businesses open to the public like Masterpiece Cakeshop may not refuse service based on factors including race, sex, national origin, or sexual orientation. After Mullins and Craig won, the Colorado Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal.

“The law is squarely on David and Charlie’s side because when businesses are open to the public, they’re supposed to be open to everyone,” said James Esseks, director of the ACLU’s LGBT Project.

“While the right to one’s religious beliefs is fundamental, a license to discriminate is not. Same-sex couples like David and Charlie deserve to be treated with the same dignity and respect as anyone else, and we’re ready to take that fight all the way to the Supreme Court.”

For those playing the home version of the game, Neil Gorsuch is already going after LGBT rights. Read HERE.

On the Rag, Vol. 453

A weekly look at what's making news in the gay mags:

Edge Media: REBAR in Chelsea is now open for business! (We checked it out last night and had fun. Is that you, Brett?)

UPDATE: Rebar has already been accused of discriminating against patrons of color. Read a thoughtful look at the situation HERE.

Lavender (Twin Cities): The restaurant issue is out now

Winq (U.K.): Hundreds protest against gay persecution in Chechnya outside Russian embassy in London

Get Out!: Diana Ross is coming to NYC!

Têtu (France): Australian pub encourages gays to hold hands in public

Metro Weekly (D.C.): "Fun Home" writer Alison Bechdel couldn't have sketched out a more successful career if she'd tried

Out in Jersey: Don't kid yourselves, guys. Marriage equality is hanging by a thread by one vote now

QX (London): Pam Ann is ready for take-off

Passport: Celebrating love in gay Key West

Outlook Ohio: Who is ready for "Tina: The Musical"?

Gay Times (U.K.): Russell Tovey, Arinzé Kene and Nico Mirallegro get intimate in "The Pass"

The Gay U.K.: Something hot's going on at The Abbey in WeHo

  Metrosource (NYC): The Rainbow Book Fair is coming up again

Attractive Men: Best pomade for men's hair

Q Salt Lake: Misty Snowm the first trans person to run for U.S. Senate, will now run for Chris Stewart's congressional seat

HIV Plus: Can I get an STI from kissing?

DNA (Australia): Work out and wash down

Echo (Phoenix): New exhibit and event series offer a look at LGBTQ rights throughout Arizona’s history

Gorsuch Calls Trump Critique of Federal Court ‘Demoralizing’ and 'Disheartening'

Some aren't buying SCOTUS nominee Neil Gorsuch's blistering attack on our "president." But I find it hard to believe that Trump's fragile ego would even allow for something so Machiavellian -- see above -- plus he's too dumb for it. Am I wrong? 

Even though everyone involved in the conversation agrees that Gorsuch said what he said, Trump is still insisting it's not true. That's normal, right?

Gorsuch a Disgrace

It almost sounds like it has to be a Photoshopped fake. But two conservative news outlets confirn that Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, really was known for railing against the "liberal faculty" at his elite all-boys prep school in Washington, D.C., which led to this "joke" in the yearbook.

His quote is equally telling. 

And I thought Alex P. Keaton was something only wacky TV writers could make up.